Something’s Up

I am working on some new product ideas for the THMStore.  I wrote an article called “Mission Adjustment” I posted in the store itself saying I am developing new products that will be exclusively sold through the store. Reselling (buying wholesale to sell retail) items are not the best way to operate a micro business. There is just not enough profit in low volume to make it worth the effort.

Since I will be doing the manufacturing, the volume will still be low but there will be no one in the middle getting a cut of the profits. I am also planning to take advantage of CAM Computer Assisted Manufacturing for making duplicated parts.

I am in the idea design stages, so I still need to build a few prototype versions and do some testing before making anything public. When I have something that looks promising, I may “leak” a review of what’s coming just to see how it flies.

I am excited with my ideas, but unfortunately it may be some time before I have examples ready for sale. That means the THMStore will stay much the same as it is for now. I have only a limited supply of time to devote to product line development and I’d rather be handling my own product.

He’s Going Loco!

I have recently added a few posts in my THMS Blog.  They are mostly about getting back into the Pennsy A3 switcher locomotive project. I started working on that project more than six years ago. I haven’t worked on it at all for thirty five months. That’s just the way it is with a hobby sometimes.

My enjoyment is in the construction. Right now I have no plans for building the 3 ½ inch wide track on which to operate the locomotive. I may just sell it if the price is right.

I’m not even working on the steam engine part yet. I am working on the tender. Go see what makes me do this crazy thing. Check the links over in the right hand column just under The Hobbyist’s Machine Shop.

Technobabble

I like the real meaning of words. Many people use words they don’t fully understand. In speaking one can get away with using similar sounding words inappropriately. However, when writing there (their) is no such luxury.

The freedom of easily producing and displaying the printed word is now provided by the advent of cheap computers and electronic publication on the internet. This is a mixed blessing. I have witnessed several Internet exhibitions of a fledgling author’s lack of writing ability. I am not talking about attempts to be overly eloquent. What I see most is bad spelling and the use of incorrect words. I see a lot of poor sentence and paragraph structure. I am totally turned off and stop reading websites and blogs published with poor writing skills on display. I also see it a lot in so-called “User Product Reports” that appear to be written with the same low skill set of an 8 year old doing a homework assignment …

There are still a lot of good writing skills being practiced. The internet has just provided a way for the writing challenged to be read by a much larger audience. It is extremely difficult to technobabble one’s self as an educated authority or expert on a subject when writing skills reveal a lack of ability in expressing written ideas. The perception is a lack of all education. One of the highest requirements on any intellectual or managerial job description is “excellent communication skills”. Writing is at the top of that communication skill list.

The advent of “texting” with personal handheld devices could create a generation of folks who believe the message is more important than the style or structure or spelling. But it doesn’t have to. I have used such minimal abbreviated text for many years using amateur radio Morse code. It has not degenerated my ability to create full text compositions. I try hard to use proper formatting and sentence structure. Note, I did not say perfect formating. I am far from perfect.

My desire is that I write well enough that my readers are not distracted by poor writing more than the presentation of the content or message. Sometimes I use style to entertain or create a unique impression. Mostly I just like to have fun in writing. I’ll use technobabble some other day to impress, I mean express myself.  :)

Flying Model Aircraft

I am involved with a few hobbies that are under federal regulation. These include Amateur Radio and recreational aircraft flying. I suppose I could include automobile driving too, but that isn’t a hobby… or maybe it is? These activities existed before there were governmental controls. I only mention that bit of history because it is important to know how government controls are intended to maintain order out of developing chaos. These regulated activities owe their creation and existence to private citizens freely experimenting with the science involved. They took theory and turned it into a functional resource so effective, it required social regulation.

I have loved flying since a very small boy. I used to run outside and scan the skies every time I heard an aircraft motor in the air. I still look and identify when I hear one. I built flying model airplanes since I was 10 years old. All my allowance went into either buying electronic components for radio experiments or balsa and kits for building model airplanes.

In my 30’s I qualified for my private pilot license. A very federally controlled privilege (not a right) and this leads me into my story here about model aircraft.

To many folks, model aircraft are toys. Some toys are model airplanes, but the hobby of model aircraft is far more reaching than playing with a toy. It provides an affordable study of the science (and yes the fun) of flying small aircraft through the air that surrounds us. A hobby association with the fancy name of the Academy of Model Aeronautics hints at the flight knowledge gained by involvement in small sized aircraft.

Forever in the past up until now, there has never been the need for federal regulation of model aircraft flying. Local laws exist in some places because of noise and other social annoyance issues, but nothing controlling the use of airspace. There are rules about height flying near established airports, but they are not regulations or laws but are strongly accepted as best practice.

So the hobby has been mostly go have fun and when flying stay away from full size aircraft and any people you may endanger in your limited flying area. This is the “see and avoid” theory, which is the basis of VFR (Visual Flight Rules) for human carrying aircraft. This has worked extremely well for the self regulated flying of model aircraft.

Today, some radio controlled model aircraft sized flying machines have developed to the point where they are no longer recreational flying machines, operating in a limited area of airspace under total control of a human pilot. The RPV (Remotely Piloted Vehicle) is the outgrowth of the hobbyist radio controlled model airplane. These RPV aircraft may still be totally controlled by a human pilot visually observing by line of sight but also have developed to the point they are being called a UAV (Unmanned Aeronautical Vehicle) because they include video and computer controlled autonomous flight abilities far beyond visual line of sight control of the hobby model airplane.

We see this type of flying vehicle every week in the media presentation of the war against terrorist, as a glorious new tool of no-risk warfare. Someone in a room in the Pentagon (example only) can fly an unmanned war machine over a battle field half way around the world. The desire of the makers of these military machines is to also sell them for application to civilian and other non military needs. This is an emerging new market to exploit. The immediate problem is there are currently no federal civilian regulations in the USA for this use. These are definately NOT model aircraft.

Unfortunately UAV’s are currently clumped into the unregulated model airplane category. No other aviation group wants them, they deserve a regulated group of their own, with their own rules and yes, I definitely think they need to be very strict rules.

The recent fallout has been for the federal government to forbid ALL model aircraft operations (flying) not just UAV’s, in a 2,827 square mile area over three miles high right down to the dirt on the ground, surrounding an airport visited by the president of the USA; if only for a few hours… for now.

I consider this regulation an extremely gross, knee jerk, unenforceable, over reaction; Impacting a nearly harmless hobby activity, making potential lawbreakers out of innocent citizens. It clearly demonstrates the lack of total impact awareness of a bureaucratic government rulemaking which, because of its own complexity, cannot quickly or clearly identify the problem. I think this overt action was intended to gain such attention for regulation. It is a demonstration that the feds are at least doing something to protect us from ourselves. Sound familiar?*

“Hide the model fuel Jake! I see the revenooers a’ commin’!”

In the next year (yes, it should take that long) new rules will be made and sanity will return. It will be the citizen’s duty to make sure the correct issues get addressed and harmless freedoms escape unscathed. It won’t be easy. I glimpsed the “terminator” sent back in time to “regulate” the source of the problem.

*I’m referring to a regulation (Heck, it was a constitutional amendment!) which created a lot of unforeseen issues, not solving the intended problem of alcoholism.

Terrorist 1 – Model Airplane Pilot 0

I am saddened to see more American freedoms taken away by American government decision makers. Because the president of the USA (code name V.I.P)  may fly into either Dallas or Austin Texas on Monday afternoon August 9, 2010, it has been deemed necessary to forbid (among a lot of real aircraft operations) the operations (flying) of ANY model airplanes within a 30 mile radius of these towns, from the ground up to but not including 18,000 feet. This is through the FDC publication of NOTAMS (Notice to Airmen) and issuance of a TFR (Temporary Flight Restriction) Read Here and also follow the links to the actual NOTAM.

Since the term “model airplane” is not defined in these notices, it includes ALL model aircraft, from a $1.00 balsa hand launch glider to a possible radio controlled terrorist flying bomb. Of course the terrorist is not going to abide by the rules. The plan is obviously make the Terrorist attempt more visible breaking the TFR rule. The old forest and the trees excuse. Cut down the forest so you can see the tree.

First, the rule is almost non-enforceable. The area included is (A=Pi *R2) 2827 square miles. The intent is that it could be enforced. If the hobbyist launches a battery powered back yard flyer in this 4.5 hour long temporary flight restriction period, that MAYBE flies in a dome radius of 400 feet (more like 100 feet), the pilot is in violation of a FAR (Federal Air Regulation). It is going to be the model pilot’s responsibility to know whenever one of these TFR’s is created and check if the intended model flight area is included. Maybe the hobbyist pilot will soon be required to file a flight plan with the FAA before going out into the back yard to hand toss a glider in the air above 0.0 inches off the ground because It may intercept AF1’s flight path.

Yes, I am being silly but so is this requirement for model airplanes. It IS an intentionally poorly defined restriction that takes freedom and privileges away from the law abiding American citizen. At minimum, it makes an innocent person, flying a model airplane into a convictible law breaker.  To micro define the intent is not the answer either. The problem and the intent is to leave interpretation open to the entity who desires to enforce the rule. So anyone including me can read this any way they see fit.

In reality this is probably a non event to model fliers. But ignorance is not an excuse. The AMA (Academy of Model Aeronautics) to which I am a long time member, has seen fit to make me aware of this issue.

Will we ever see an Air Force fighter jet strafe a R/C model flying field because someone didn’t know a TFR was in place? The sky’s the limit…

UPDATE 8/9/10: This is a MAJOR EVENT to model aviation. To date model aviation has been regulated by the FAA by not being regulated. This WILL change. The advent of autonomous amateur and comercial pilotless or actually Remote Piloted Vehicals (RPV’s) and Unmaned Air Vehicles (UAV’s) operating in controlled airspace has focused unwanted and up until now, un-needed attention on the recreational world of Model Aviation.

My spin (first impression) about terrorist creating the TFR because of the VIP safety issues may still be valid but perhaps not totally accurate. The implication of restrictions for model aviation is far broader because of the autonomous RPV and UAV issues.

 I will be posting more on this in the future.