{"id":2922,"date":"2013-07-17T17:49:15","date_gmt":"2013-07-17T22:49:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ramblindan.org\/?p=2922"},"modified":"2013-07-19T11:41:06","modified_gmt":"2013-07-19T16:41:06","slug":"what-you-see-is-what-i-show-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/?p=2922","title":{"rendered":"What You See Is What I Show You"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ngg_shortcode_0_placeholderI love taking good photographs. I don\u2019t so much like poor photography. To me there is a world of difference between taking pictures and true photography. Today we have a lot of ordinary folks \u201ctaking pictures\u201d using simple cameras such as the ubiquitous cell phone camera. There is some good photography done with cell phone cameras, so I hold no disrespect of the tool.<\/p>\n<p>Current cell phone cameras have very few controls and are extremely difficult to hold steady. So that makes them both simple and difficult at the same time. The result is a lot of mediocre quality pictures being taken by millions of unskilled people.<\/p>\n<p>Not a complaint, just an observation. Perhaps it is an obscure observation as per the blog sub title. Many people love their \u201cdigital snapshots\u201d so I have no desire to make everyone a professional photographer. It is just not a requirement. The same was probably said when the first Kodak camera made personal photography accessible.<\/p>\n<p>I love digital photography. I am old enough to have started with film cameras. I have no reason to go back to film. I know I have produced some very good photography with film, but the image control now available with digital beats anything in film except for very large format negatives or original positives.<\/p>\n<p>I have nearly 10,000 digital photos on my computer. Probably far less than half are unique. This simply indicates I can afford to take multiple digital shots and later choose which ones are my keepers. With film shooting I was far more miserly and selective of each exposure, not wanting to \u201cwaste\u201d film and development time and cost. Those days are gone.<\/p>\n<p>My interest is in the technical image quality as well as composition of the image. I separate photographic art from pure technical image capture but I don\u2019t declare one superior or exclusive to the other.<\/p>\n<p>Cropping and editing are an integral part of the final presented image.\u00a0 For me everything does not have to happen in the camera. Darkroom processing (manipulation) has long been a step in the process to finished image.<\/p>\n<p>There is also an art style I call \u201ctrick\u201d photography where images are modified (edited) from the real life captured state. Removing blemishes is called retouching. That is a very minor trick. I have removed fire alarms switches from walls in wedding photographs where they distracted from the image.<\/p>\n<p>Changing complete heads or adding\/deleting people is more tricky than retouching but some edits are not intended to be realistic. They are just part of the creative fun.<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t have a personal rule that photography has to be WYSIWYG (Whizzy-wig \u2013 What you see (in life) is what you get). It\u2019s more like WYSIWISY. (whizzy-wisy\u2013 What you see is what I show you.) The art of good photography is in the presentation. It is what makes viewing an image a total new, fresh, engaging or exciting experience. There is an almost unlimited number of ways to achieve that goal. It doesn\u2019t always have to be a great subject. A bug on a flower can be as good a subject as a sunset in the Grand Canyon.<\/p>\n<p>My photographic desire is perfect focal and light image control (camera and lens) combined with captivating subject composition and presentation. Oh, and having fun doing that over and over.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I love taking good photographs. I don\u2019t so much like poor photography. To me there is a world of difference between taking pictures and true photography. Today we have a lot of ordinary folks \u201ctaking pictures\u201d using simple cameras such as the ubiquitous cell phone camera. There is some good photography done with cell phone cameras, so I hold no disrespect of the tool. Current cell phone cameras have very few controls and are extremely&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[152],"tags":[29,145],"class_list":["post-2922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photography-2","tag-photo","tag-photography"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2922\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ramblindan.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}