A Pie Eater?

When operating, a heat sink (not show) must be applied to the processor.

A friend of mine, Mike S. in Michigan, USA has sent me a new SBC (Single Board Computer) with which to play. It is a super-set clone of the Rapberry Pi (RPi) design. The board layout, size and basic design are equal. But it has much more of everything else.

The SBC is called the Asus Tinker Board S. I will refer to it as the ATB-S. Sometimes just leave off the Asus A (TB-S).

The technical specifications are impressive.

The processor High speed operates at 1.8GHz rather than 1.4GHz and has four cores like the RPi. Also 2GB of LPDDR3 dual channel memory rather than the 1GB of the Rpi.. A big addition is 16GB of onboard eMMC (not available on the Rpi) and an SD 3.0 interface, the place for a micro SD card – same as the Rpi.

There are more features that are an improvement over the present Raspberry Pi

All this comes at a price of course, making the ~$61.00 ATB-S, 1.74 times more expensive than the ~$35.00 Rpi. Not too extreme when considering the improved specifications. What might be deduced here is how hard it could be for the Raspberry Pi to hold it’s long standing price point in its next revision.

As I said, the ATB-S has been gifted to me. Would I purchase the ATB-S given the choice with the RPi? I think it would depend on the application. In an applications where long term dedicated use, like a file server is intended., the answer is probably yes.

For non critical use like learning programming and developing code, the lower cost, lower speed RPi is certainly adequate at a lower price.

However, The price pain point (for me) between $35 and $61 is not severe in a one-off purchase decision. If I were building one hundred kiosks that didn’t need the extra performance, then the answer is definitely NO. So, my answer is, “It depends…”

I have been using the RPi for an email terminal and occasional web browser. The extra performance, I feel, will certainly be noticed. I will soon see…

Is the ATB-S a Pie eater? Ha! Certainly not where the higher price is an important factor. The niche for the RPi is its low cost low, but reasonable performance. Driving cost higher could take it out of the niche. Asus may be exploring where that upper edge price boundary lies.

If a super RPi is produced at the same (higher) cost, the RPi may dominate just because of fan loyalty and its huge SBC market presence. Asus is also a huge brand. I think it could be interesting where the copy-cat format ATB-S will go in the next round. Certainly depends how well the current ATB-S SBC performs for the accountants at Asus. It is already their second edition. (There is a non -S Tinker Board at lower cost.)